top of page

The Angel in Exodus 23:20-21: Angels Cannot Forgive Sins But Are Yah's Instrument Of Divine Judgement


The book of Exodus is a cornerstone of biblical theology, narrating the journey of the Israelites from bondage to freedom. A pivotal aspect of this journey, as detailed in Exodus 23:20-21, is the role of an angel appointed by Yah. This passage has often been the subject of theological discussion, particularly regarding the nature and limits of angelic authority. The text makes it explicit that the angel does not have the power to forgive sins, but rather has a defined role in guiding, protecting, and executing Yah's judgment on the Israelites in cases of disobedience. The phrase "for my name is in him" implies that the angel acts with God's authority and carries out His judgments but does not independently forgive sins.

Biblical Context and the Nature of Divine Judgment

In the wider biblical narrative, angels are often portrayed as agents of Yah’s will, executing divine commands. They are not independent actors with their own authority but function under Yah's sovereignty. The power to forgive sins, according to biblical theology, is an exclusive attribute of Yah.

The Angel's Role: Guidance, Protection, and Execution of Judgment

The specific role of the angel in Exodus 23:20-21 encompasses guidance, protection, and the execution of divine judgment. The phrase "he will not pardon your transgressions" is not a commentary on the angel's ability to forgive sins but a directive about his role in executing divine judgment. In this context, the angel is an instrument of Yah's justice and is tasked with executing Yah’s judgement if the Israelites rebel. This role is highlighted in other biblical instances where angels execute judgment, such as in 2 Samuel 24:16-17, where an angel is sent to execute judgment but is also restrained by Yah, indicating their role as executors of divine will.

Another relevant example is found in the book of Revelation (Revelation 7:1), where angels are depicted as executing aspects of Yah’s judgment during the end times. These examples demonstrate the biblical precedent of angels acting as agents of Yah's judgment, reinforcing the interpretation of the angel in Exodus as a guardian of Yah’s commandments and an executor of divine judgment on the rebellious.


In conclusion, Exodus 23:20-21 defines the angel's role as one of guidance, protection, and the execution of Yah's judgment on the Israelites in cases of disobedience. This passage is not about the angel's ability to forgive sins but emphasizes the angel's function as an instrument of divine judgment. This interpretation aligns with the broader biblical portrayal of angels as servants of Yah's will, carrying out His directives and executing His judgments, as seen in various instances throughout the Bible. The passage in Exodus thus reaffirms the role of angels within the divine order as agents of Yah's will, specifically in the context of guiding, protecting, and enacting divine justice upon the Israelites as commanded by Yah.

735 views5 comments


Mildred Leevy
Mildred Leevy

100% agree of the angels' role in YAH's kingdom.


This is an absolute fantastic presentation on the role is angels. I have been fascinated with angels for decades and I’m glad to see you explain this Min Tayu. I would love to hear and study more about their roles.


This article was poorly done. All you did was superimpose your opinion by bringing out precepts that aligned with your presupposition. This is an opinion piece and Sounds like you found this commentary online somewhere. Wheres your precept to further substantiate your argument that Angel's cant forgive sins? The precepts you gave were not clear in answering that. This is the issues i have with christianites. Yall throw out random ambiguous scriptures that can mean anything but cant provide the precepts to clearly convey your argument.

TayU Yaho
TayU Yaho

ROFL. Show me your precepts for your claim that Angels can forgive sins. This is all about your reckless application of the context of the actual text. I have evidence for my position showing this to be the case but you cannot find anywhere in the scriptures from Genesis to Revelation that back up your poor exegesis of the scriptures. You simply have a lack of ability to glean the meaning of the context of a passage. You claim that I have no scriptural support to refute your false position but look at you all, you take one transliteration and then make a doctrine out of it

bottom of page